Microsuction versus syringing for ear wax
Both methods aim to remove wax. They feel different, carry different risks, and suit different ears. HearMed’s standard clinic method is microsuction.
If someone offers “a quick syringe” without looking properly, ask what they can see and whether suction under magnification is available instead.
Reviewed by Rose Multaney and Rauri Keogh, HearMed audiologists · Updated September 2026
Microsuction in short
The clinician views the canal (often with a microscope or endoscope) and uses a fine suction probe to lift wax out in controlled pieces.
You stay sitting. You may hear a loud suction sound. The point is visibility: we stop if the view is unclear or the ear is unsuitable that day.
Syringing (irrigation) in short
Warm water is flushed into the canal to wash wax out. It can work on soft wax in uncomplicated ears, and many people still remember it from older GP pathways.
Irrigation is a poor fit after some ear surgeries, with certain infections, or when the eardrum status is uncertain. It can also leave water behind and feel messy.
What we do at HearMed
We use microsuction as standard in clinic (€60) and can arrange home wax removal (€100) where appropriate. We do not market syringing as our default.
If wax is dense, we may advise softening drops first, then a return visit. Pushing through a blocked view helps nobody.
Tullamore, Portlaoise and Portumna
Book a free hearing test
Call the local number, send a WhatsApp, or leave your number. No referral.